EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia

The bloc’s agreed partial embargo may prove to be ineffective as higher prices could compensate for reduced volumes

The aim of economic warfare is to inflict maximum pain at minimum cost. Achieving that is hard when the target is a key commodity producer. The EU’s agreement to ban most Russian oil imports reflects justified outrage at the barbaric invasion of Ukraine. But it may prove to be ineffective.

The problem with oil is that it is traded internationally. Higher prices may compensate Russia for reduced volumes, as US Treasury secretary Janet Yellen argued in April. Equally, customers in the EU and outside it may swap sources of supply in response to price signals, with little ultimate impact on the Russian exchequer.

The lower the level of substitution, the more powerful the partial embargo. Some countries, for example, lack refineries that can process Urals, Russia’s sulphurous main export blend.

That is not a problem for China and India. They have already moved to fill the gap in demand for Russian oil created by self-sanctioning by European refiners and traders. India rarely bought Russian oil in the past. But it emerged as the largest purchaser of Russian Urals crude in April, according to S&P Global.

Asian countries may not take up the full slack in demand for Russian oil, however, fearing retaliatory western sanctions. Capital Economics thinks Russia’s oil exports will fall by a fifth this year, even allowing for a 15 per cent rise in exports to non-western countries. But after factoring in higher prices, the consultancy estimates that Russia’s oil export revenues will be $180bn, a mere $2bn lower than in 2021.

The gap between Brent and Urals crude — currently $31 — may eventually fall in response to substitution. One response from the west may be to ban its insurers from covering tankers carrying Russian oil. Creating friction of a logistical kind is one way of compensating for a lack of it in markets.

Even after the oil embargo is fully phased in next year, it may be more than offset by higher gas prices. The oil embargo reduces Europe’s financial complicity. It will not, by itself, sabotage the Russian war machine.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

亚马逊加紧将生成式AI移植到Alexa的“大脑”

亚马逊准备重新推出其Alexa语音数字助理,作为一种可完成实际任务的AI“代理”,但其仍需克服几个技术障碍。

扎克伯格骨子里的懦弱

凯莉:Meta取消事实核查机制,令其看起来像是在向特朗普屈服。

2025年会成为伦敦IPO市场的希望之年吗?

在2024年令人失望的表现之后,一批金融服务、工业和消费类企业可能会在今年在伦敦上市。

阿莉塞•魏德尔:领导德国极右翼的前高盛分析师

德国选择党总理候选人在党代会上发表激烈演讲,试图利用目前推动欧美民粹主义者掌权的右翼东风。

美国劳动力市场并未降温

以及关于稳定币的回复。

一周展望:美国通胀是否会进一步上升?

本周将公布的数据包括美国12月消费者价格指数,中国第四季度国内生产总值,以及英国12月通胀率与经济增长率。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×