Boeing: how not to run a national champion | 波音:国民品牌的反面教材 - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT英语电台

Boeing: how not to run a national champion
波音:国民品牌的反面教材

The aircraft maker needs a deeper cultural overhaul, starting at the top
这家飞机制造商需要从高层开始进行更深入的文化改革
00:00

“If it’s not Boeing, I’m not going,” was long a cherished slogan of the aircraft giant. Not everyone agrees today: French finance minister Bruno Le Maire said this week that he preferred “flying in Airbus over Boeing — my family too, they care about me”. The quip probably reflected often bitter transatlantic rivalries over plane-making. But five years after twin Boeing 737 Max 8 plane crashes killed 346 people, and two months after a door panel on another model blew out mid-flight, the company’s woes seem to be deepening. As the Southwest Airlines CEO has put it, Boeing needs to “get the issues understood and get the issues fixed”.

An initial probe into January’s door plug blowout concluded four bolts meant to attach it had not been fitted. In the months before, Boeing had had issues with misdrilled bulkhead holes and a missing rudder control nut. The mishaps keep coming. The US regulator, the Federal Aviation Administration, warned last week of improperly installed wiring bundles on 737 Max planes. And 50 passengers were hurt when a 787 flying from Australia to New Zealand suddenly plunged, after which Boeing told airlines to inspect switches on 787 pilots’ seats.

The FAA said an audit of Boeing and its key supplier Spirit AeroSystems had found multiple alleged failures to comply with manufacturing quality requirements; it has given Boeing bosses 90 days to draw up a plan to fix quality issues. An expert panel found a “disconnect” between top managers and staff and “inadequate and confusing” safety processes.

Resultant delays in Boeing deliveries are affecting airlines and passengers. Half a dozen US and European carriers have warned that their plans to increase capacity are in doubt. Airline trust in Boeing management and its CEO Dave Calhoun is being sorely tested.

The roots of the problems are well catalogued. A shift in culture after Boeing bought McDonnell Douglas in 1997 put financial returns ahead of engineering prowess. The company relied more on suppliers to build parts, and spun off some operations into separate businesses — such as Spirit — as it focused on final assembly. The FAA delegated too much 737 Max safety certification work to Boeing itself. Lina Khan, Federal Trade Commission chair, presents Boeing as a cautionary tale of the pitfalls of “national champions”; turning it into a too-big-to-fail domestic monopoly in commercial aircraft lessened the pressure for innovation and excellence.

Airbus is a European “champion” too, assembled from mergers and aided by state support, and uses a network of outsourced suppliers that also includes Spirit. Yet, while it has made its own past strategic mis-steps, Airbus has avoided the quality and safety traps Boeing has fallen into. In response, the US company has not stood still. It created a board-level aerospace safety committee and a chief safety officer role. It has centralised safety reporting functions; engineers now report to the chief engineer, who reports directly to Calhoun.

But recent months have made clear how much remains to be done. To regain its manufacturing verve, Boeing should bring Spirit back in-house (talks are under way), improve its approach to quality assurance and rebuild relations with squeezed suppliers. Above all, it needs a wider cultural reboot, starting with an overhaul of top management.

Calhoun, a former GE executive, stabilised the company and repaired relations with regulators after the 737 Max 8 crashes. But as a Boeing director since 2009, he was on the board when the crashes happened and — though Covid intervened — has had four years at the helm to fix the problems. His time to demonstrate that he can do so is fast running out.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

你是否应该在股指创新高时买入?

这感觉很不对,但投资者(包括我)不必太担心。

詹姆斯•克莱弗利:“我一直说没有多少选票可以玩……”

这位政治家首次谈到他是如何在一夜之间从保守党领袖竞选的领先者意外地获得第三名的。

一周新闻小测:2024年11月2日

您对本周的全球重大新闻了解如何?来做个小测试吧!

美国大选的第二天会发生什么?

历史上最紧张的总统竞选之一可能不会在晚上结束,随后可能会出现多重危机。

唐纳德•特朗普说利兹•切尼是“战争鹰派”,应该“被枪指着”

共和党候选人对政治对手的措辞引发新争论。

孟加拉国的意外革命者:一名84岁的老人和一些学生

年轻的抗议者推举诺贝尔奖得主尤努斯担任看守领导人。但改革国家民主体制的时间已经不多了。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×