AI copyright wars need a market solution - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
人工智能

AI copyright wars need a market solution

Data licensing can support a thriving ecosystem for tech firms and creators
00:00

For a still nascent technology, generative artificial intelligence already has an impressive resume. It can compose music, summarise wads of legal documents in seconds and generate television adverts based on minimal descriptive input. To become even cleverer, weed out errors and broaden its uses, AI models will need to continuously ingest human-generated content to train on. But the legal framework required to facilitate this symbiosis between man and machine has fallen woefully behind. That puts the long-term development of the technology, and the individuals and companies who feed it with unique data and insights, in harm’s way.

Generative AI models owe their capabilities, so far, to the reams of text, sounds, images and videos posted online. Much of this has been scraped without the consent of the original creators. Disagreements over how copyright laws apply to gen-AI training have also fomented protests and litigation battles around the world. Model developers tend to argue that “fair use” exemptions, which allow the use of copyrighted material under specific conditions, for instance by researchers using short, cited excerpts, are applicable. Artists, musicians and the media strongly disagree. They allege that AI companies are breaching their rights to intellectual property protections, since they go beyond merely excerpting their data.

With legal cases ensuing across America and discord in Europe over how the EU’s AI Act applies, Britain has at least taken initiative to provide clarity. Last week, it closed a consultation into plans for the future of copyright and AI. But the UK government is also caught between wanting to be attractive for AI companies to scale and drive economic growth, while also protecting its world-class creative industry.

Though Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has suggested that plans are not set in stone, the consultation did indicate that the government favours allowing AI firms to use copyrighted work to train their models without consent, unless the owner opted out. That approach would be a mistake. It tilts the playing field against content creators, overturning a default right, which has stood for centuries, that no one should be able to profit from another’s established IP. Though the opt-out mechanism is used in the EU, the systems needed to process and enforce them, across numerous platforms and use cases, are patchy.

Legislators around the world should recognise that building a sustainable and fast-growing gen-AI ecosystem depends on the strength and trust of those that produce the source data. Indeed, enabling tech firms to absorb their content, against their will, to build highly scalable competitors against them, undermines the creative and innovative incentives of individuals and companies in the first place.

There is a better way forward: supporting licensing markets. Remunerated consent between creators and AI companies gives content makers control over their copyright (it is opt-in by design) and compensation for their work, which incentivises their efforts. It also gives AI models sustained access to high-quality data, free from legal wrangling. Many creative businesses, including this newspaper, have already struck individual content licensing deals with AI companies. Moving from ad hoc deals to a broader market for training licenses is the next step. Governments can help by supporting industry-led transparency standards for how training data is used alongside the development of software to process and track licenses.

As it reviews its consultation responses, Britain’s government now has an opportunity to set a global standard for how AI and human creativity can coexist. If it wants to create a competitive environment to attract AI companies that actually endures, developing a free and fair market for data is a win-win solution.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

为什么欧洲无法只依靠法国的核保护伞

马克龙已邀请其他欧洲领导人讨论是否能够以及如何利用法国的核武库来威慑俄罗斯未来的侵略。

伦敦在“打击犯罪的技术竞赛”中扩展闭路电视网络

随着警方努力应对街头犯罪激增,伦敦各区议会急于配备人工智能摄像头。

Lex专栏:风险无法浇灭黄金投资者的热情

黄金是抵御地缘政治动荡、通货膨胀和低利率的终极减震器。

能源账单飙升令阿尔巴尼斯在澳大选中陷入被动

生活成本担忧加剧,澳大利亚反对党指责政府的可再生能源政策导致价格上涨。

Lex专栏:美国屋顶太阳能业务前景黯淡

更长的高利率和敌视清洁能源的总统是一个有毒的组合。

关税不确定性增加美联储设定利率的难度

经济学家警告称,在市场波动性加剧之际,美联储过于依赖后顾性数据存在风险。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×